When Fibonacci and Lucas Meet Smith: A Computational Exploration
Ronie P. Dario, João L. Gonçalves, Moniky P. N. Oliveira
Abstract
The Fibonacci and Lucas sequences are old friends in recreational number theory. Here we ask a simple question: which of their terms Fn and Ln are Smith numbers? A Smith number is a composite integer whose decimal digit sum equals the sum of the decimal digits of its prime factors, counted with multiplicity. The question is easy to state, but for large n it quickly becomes a factorization problem. Using available complete factorization data, we carried out computational searches in both sequences and obtained new Smith terms in each of them. For the Lucas sequence, the first author's search found ten Smith terms with indices below 1000: 3, 95, 105, 114, 183, 437, 609, 682, 827, 902. These results were published in the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences as OEIS A395686. Four further indices, 1090, 1153, 1215, 1378, were subsequently added to the sequence by Sean A. Irvine. For the Fibonacci sequence, starting from the cases already recorded in OEIS A382922, our search produced seven further Smith numbers: F1440, F1554, F1596, F1863, F2256, F2277, F2559. For the even-index cases, the identity F2n=FnLn allows available Fibonacci and Lucas factorization data to be combined to recover the complete factorizations needed for the Smith test. Surprisingly, the two searches also meet at index 827: both F827 and L827 are Smith numbers.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A new proof that more than 2/3 of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are simple and on the critical line
Youness Lamzouri
Petersson-Rigid Lattices in a Census of 100 Rank-Three Root Bases
Eungang Cho
Adelic points and unmramified Brauer approximation for classifying stacks
Ajneet Dhillon
On divergence related to Riemann--von Mangoldt's explicit formula of the prime-counting function
Harald Grobner
On the occurrence of congruence multiplicities between Ramanujan's theta functions
Shane Chern, Nicolas Allen Smoot, Dazhao Tang
Improved Weyl bounds on short intervals
Xiyu Hu