Most (0,1)-polytopes are not normal
Santiago Morales
Abstract
We prove that the proportion of 0/1-equivalence classes of d-dimensional (0,1)-polytopes that are normal tends to zero at least at a double exponential rate as d∞. As a consequence, the same holds for any of the following classes given by the type of triangulation possible: (a) quadratic, (b) flag unimodular, (c) regular unimodular, or (d) unimodular, among others. We classify the 0/1-equivalence classes of d-dimensional (0,1)-polytopes for d≤5 according to whether they admit a unimodular, flag unimodular, or quadratic triangulation. In dimension five, exactly 175 out of 1,226,525 classes have a flag unimodular triangulation, but no quadratic triangulation. Among them, there are polytopes whose toric rings are not Koszul; thus, we find the first polytopes that have a flag unimodular triangulation, but whose toric ring is not Koszul. In contrast with the matroid case, we exhibit a delta-matroid polytope that is not normal.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Canonical-row Chern flow on Bott--Samelson towers: realizable-volume models for Schubert, Grothendieck, and Lascoux polynomials
Khai-Hoan Nguyen-Dang, Zhenpeng Wang
Degeneracy bounds, stability, and a sharp gap for B-colorings
Xiaoxue Hu, Jiangxu Kong, Yiqiao Wang
Duals of algebraic matroids need not be algebraic
Matt Larson, Tuong Le
Bounded Twin-Width Tournaments are -Bounded
Chaoliang Tang, Junchi Zhang
An Affine Semigroup from Orbifold Boundary Conditions: cut, phylogenetic and hierarchical models in the unit-weight sector, and weighted configurations beyond them
Carles Marín
Fourteen lonely runners
Jaan Allikvere