"What If I Had Participated?" A Machine Learning-Based Counterfactual Analysis of Non-Participants' Success Potential in STEM Competitions: The Case of the German Physics Olympiad
Paul Tschisgale, Knut Neumann
Abstract
STEM student competitions aim to identify capable, science-interested students and further support them in developing their STEM-related abilities and interests. When such students do not participate, they may appear to be missed not only by the competition but by this form of support altogether; unless they are reached through other competitions. The present study therefore investigated to what extent students who would likely have succeeded in the German Physics Olympiad are missed by it. The study sample comprised 282 Olympiad participants and 1,103 non-participants from academic-track secondary schools, all assessed on 31 indicators spanning sociodemographic background, cognitive abilities, self-related beliefs, motivational variables, personality traits, vocational interests, and prior participation across other STEM competitions. Three machine learning models (elastic net, random forest, gradient boosting) were trained on the participant sample to predict first-round success based on those indicators. The elastic net was found to perform best. Although predictive accuracy was modest, the model proved well-calibrated, supporting valid group-level inferences. Only a few variables predicted success: mathematics skills, physics- and engineering-related skills, and having skipped a grade were positive predictors, whereas conventional vocational interests were a negative predictor. When applied to the non-participants, the model identified 43 students (3.9%) as potentially successful. Crucially, 74% of these students had previously entered at least one selective STEM competition, leaving only 11 students (ca. 1% of all non-participants) entirely unreached by the selective STEM competition system. These findings indicate that the majority of potentially successful non-participants are not absent from the selective STEM competition system but are engaged by it through other domains.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Determining the degree of randomness in multiple-choice question distractors
JPW Diener, BL Frick, J Kriek
Teaching a plasma physics and engineering class at a liberal arts college using Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs)
Bhavesh Ramkorun
From Two-Level Hamiltonians to Quantum Superposition and Measurement: A Traceable Classroom Module
Boris Kiefer
Community agreements pedagogy in physics
Rachel E. Scherr, Jer Steeger, Paige Sechrest
Activity Report on the Ninth African School of Fundamental Physics and Applications (ASP2026)
Kétévi A. Assamagan, Mounia Laassiri, Bobby Acharya et al.
Artificial Neural Network Assisted Modelling of Tangent Galvanometer Measurements for the Determination of Horizontal Component of Earth's Magnetic Field
Saralasrita Mohanty, Sudakshina Prusty, Anshuman Pal et al.