Is Your AI Fast Enough to Run a Fusion Reactor?
Nathaniel Chen, Andrew Rothstein, Ricardo Shousha, Hiro Farre-Kaga, Peter Steiner, Azarakhsh Jalalvand, Egemen Kolemen
Abstract
Machine learning models are increasingly used in feedback control loops for nuclear fusion, where inference speed and predictable timing are critical. We summarize lessons from models deployed for control on the DIII-D tokamak and develop a benchmark to compare inference backends across ten neural networks and model components from fusion control and diagnostic pipelines. For models greater than five million parameters, the CPU backends take tens to thousands of milliseconds, while GPU inference is substantially faster, suggesting an upper limit on CPU-oriented development for control. These results show why the deployment backend must be selected together with the model and its control-cycle budget.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Birth-Potential Multigroup Fluid Model for Ballistic Electrons: Breakdown and Cathode Sheath Regimes
Bernard Parent, Brendan Perry
Analysis of grid instabilities in particle-in-cell codes based on a meshfree approach
J. M. Finn, E. G. Evstatiev
A Nonlinear Two-Sheath Circuit Model for Low-Pressure Symmetric and Asymmetric Capacitively Coupled Radio-Frequency Plasmas
Katharina Noesges, Tim Bolles, Máté Vass et al.
Quantitative schlieren imaging of a laser-ionized plasma channel in atomic vapor using symbolic regression
Gabor Demeter
Electromagnetic drift-kinetic particle-in-cell model with energy and charge conservation for studying finite-β plasmas
O. P. Morozov, V. A. Kurshakov, I. V. Timofeev
Theory of Equivalent Tokamaks for Characterizing Turbulent Transport in Quasi-symmetric Stellarators
Hongxuan Zhu, R. Gaur, X. Wei et al.