Fairness and Non-wastefulness in Matching with Siblings and Initial Enrollments: Compatibility and Complexity

Abstract

We study a two-sided matching problem between families and daycare centers in which a family may have multiple children with joint preferences, and some children may already be enrolled in daycare centers while seeking transfers. Our model combines and generalizes two well-studied matching frameworks: matching with couples and school choice with initial enrollments. The interaction between joint family preferences and initial enrollments creates fundamental challenges for the existence of desirable outcomes and the design of computationally efficient algorithms. Since stable matchings need not exist, we decompose stability into individual rationality, fairness, and non-wastefulness, and study the trade-off between fairness and non-wastefulness from two complementary directions. To preserve non-wastefulness, we first consider master-list-based approaches and show that they are insufficient in the presence of initial enrollments. We then introduce \emph{resettlement}, which protects displaced families by allowing them to return to their initial assignments, and develop a greedy improvement algorithm that establishes the existence of matchings satisfying non-wastefulness together with resettlement-based fairness. To preserve fairness, we first examine a generalized cutoff approach and then develop a fairness-preserving non-wasteful algorithm that guarantees fairness together with a relaxed notion of non-wastefulness. We further characterize the computational complexity of these solution concepts. While several fairness notions can be verified in polynomial time, deciding whether a non-wasteful matching satisfying them exists is NP-complete. Resettlement restores universal existence, but computing resettlement-based outcomes is PLS-hard, and verifying the stronger dominance-based fairness notion is coNP-complete.