AI-assisted mitotic counting improves reproducibility and efficiency across multiple tumour types
Simon Graham, Mostafa Jahanifar, Quoc Dang Vu, Vygante Maskoliunaite, Donatas Petroska, Ruta Barbora Valkiuniene, Ayat Gamal Lashen, Jen Hong Ong, Amede Ogechi Nnorom, Sinclair Couper, Natasha Kardasz, Reshma Agrawal, Brinder Singh Chohan, Jose Luis Solorzano Rendon, Shonali Natu, Arvydas Laurinavicius, Nasir Rajpoot, David Snead
Abstract
Mitotic counting is an important component of tumour grading, diagnosis and prognostic assessment across several tumour types, but manual assessment is time-consuming and subject to inter-pathologist variability. To help address these challenges, we developed MitPro, an AI tool designed to improve consistency and efficiency by directing pathologists towards regions with the highest predicted mitotic activity and highlighting mitotic figures for review, while retaining pathologist control over region selection and the final count. We evaluated its effect on the reproducibility and efficiency of mitotic counting in a retrospective, non-interventional, paired reader study comprising 385 whole-slide images from 3 centres in 3 countries and 7 tumour types using 3 different scanners. 13 pathologists participated, with each slide assessed independently by 3 pathologists without AI assistance and again with AI assistance after a minimum 2 week washout period. Across all slides, AI-assisted counting increased the intraclass correlation coefficient from 0.589 to 0.949. Mean pathologist-level median assessment time decreased from 286.4 to 127.8 seconds, corresponding to an average saving of 151.8 seconds per assessment. Improvements in agreement and efficiency were also observed in supporting analyses using HALO AP and Sectra image management systems and in 2 additional tumour types outside the main study population. AI-assisted assessment was associated with a subtle shift towards higher mitotic counts and scores, consistent with identification of more active mitotic hotspots and fewer missed mitotic figures. The frequency of score change between unassisted and AI-assisted assessment was comparable with inter-pathologist variation during routine counting. These findings support the use of MitPro as an assistive tool for more consistent and efficient mitotic assessment in routine practice.
Create a lesson
Related papers
ScholarCatalyst: A Benchmark for Retrieving Papers That Inspire New Research
Sohyeon Kim, Yoonho Lee, Bo Liu et al.
VISTA: A Visual Harness for Reasoning in an Interactive World
Qiushi Han, Keya Hu, Linlu Qiu et al.
A Comparative Explainability Framework for DeBERTa-v3 in Zero-Shot Medical Abstract Classification
Javier Diaz Esteban-Herreros, David Muñoz-Valero, Raquel Martínez-España et al.
Homomorphic Advantage Operator: Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning Under Fully Homomorphic Encryption Constraints
Abid Mohamed Nadhir, Ahmad Al Hanbali, Beggas Mounir
PyPottery: an AI-powered end-to-end suite for pottery processing and publication
Lorenzo Cardarelli
Causal Memory Policy: Making Memory Utility Identifiable by Intervening on Retrieval
Arman Behnam, Binghui Wang