Beyond Risk Prediction: Evidence Grounding and Psychosocial Factor Verification for Explainable Suicide Risk Assessment
Tianle Hu, Chen Peng, Yi-Hsin Tsai, Takshing Andy Tung, Bingyang Sun, Yenjou Wang
Abstract
Identifying suicide risk from social networking services (SNS) posts is important for detecting suicide-related signals in online environments. However, risk classification alone provides limited insight into the textual evidence and psychosocial factors behind a prediction. Based on the IEEE BigData 2026 Explainable Suicide Risk Detection Challenge, this study presents a framework consisting of Risk Assessment, Evidence Grounding, and Factor Identification. Risk Assessment uses length-based routing to accommodate posts of different lengths. Evidence Grounding identifies supporting phrases and uses a Risk-Evidence constraint to maintain consistency with the Risk prediction. For Factor Identification, two verifiers are used. The Taxonomy Verifier focuses on factor semantics, whereas the Evidence-Aware Verifier uses factor-specific lexical-semantic cues to select informative positive training units. Their prediction probabilities are combined to produce the final factor predictions. The three tasks are evaluated using task-specific F1 score measures. Risk Assessment achieved a Weighted F1 of 0.8088, Evidence Grounding achieved a test Macro row F1 of 0.7605, and Factor Identification achieved a Macro F1 of 0.5562. The results show that the framework can provide risk predictions, along with supporting textual evidence and fine-grained information on psychosocial factors. Overall, the proposed framework extends suicide-risk assessment beyond risk-level prediction and provides a more interpretable analysis of SNS posts.
Create a lesson
Related papers
RSI-Anything: Unlocking Recursive Self-Improvement with World Models
Taoyong Cui, Pinxian Zeng, Wanghan Xu et al.
When VLMs Destroy What They Know: Spatial Representations Fall Below Lexical Priors
Shubh Garg, Chen Shani
Structural Automata for Neural Semantic Parsing
Xiao Zhang
Task Context Shapes Component Roles in Language Models
Sovesh Mohapatra, Dani S Bassett
Can Language Models Learn When to Abstain? Policy Learning and Calibrated Answer Selection
Juan Terven, Diana-Margarita Córdova-Esparza, Ruben Gomez et al.
Error Rate is Not Enough: Costs of Augmentation in Low-Resource ASR
Katsumi Ibaraki, David Chiang