A joint error metric for scoring CFD against wind tunnel data, scaled by the robust spread of the participants (AutoCFD5 Case 2)
Hendrik Hetmann, Charles Mockett
Abstract
AutoCFD5 Case 2 compares the participants' CFD results with wind tunnel measurements of surface pressure, velocity profiles and force coefficients. To place each run on a diagram of error against computational cost, these quantities must be combined into one number. This note defines that number, the joint error. Following the practice of interlaboratory proficiency testing (ISO 13528), every deviation from the experiment is expressed in units of the spread of the participants' results at that point, estimated robustly with the standard's Algorithm A. The point-wise spreads are pooled into one scale per component, so that every measurement point carries equal weight within its component. The joint error is a fixed weighted sum of five component errors. The scales are computed once from all AutoCFD5 submissions received by 5 October 2026 and then frozen, so that scores are reproducible and comparable across workshops.
Create a lesson
Related papers
MindVLM: Neural-Grounded Visual Captioning via Subject-Aware Semantic Evidence Selection
Zixiang Yin, Yu-Ping Wang, Zhengming Ding
Mesh-Native Tokenisation: Retrofitting Foundation Models to Unstructured Data
Georg Maierhofer, Miles Cranmer, Payel Mukhopadhyay
AB-PIELMs: Adaptive-Basis Physics-Informed Extreme Learning Machines for Residual-Driven Domain Decomposition
Aldis Daniel, Vikas Dwivedi, Balaji Srinivasan
Sign-Constrained Intervention Effects for Domain-Generalizable ICU World Models
Zhen Xu, Nicholas Konz, Zhen Tan et al.
Synchronization Reveals Market Structure That Classical Randomness Tests Cannot Detect
Nam H. Le
A mesh-based neural energy method for the simulation of heterogeneous composites
Pius J. M. Wichmann, Stefan Hildebrand, Sandra Klinge