The Myth of Restrictive Working-Time Agreements: Firms' Working-Time Adjustment after Exit from Collective Bargaining
Vinzenz Pyka, André Rieder
Abstract
Employers in Germany argue that collective agreements restrict their flexibility concerning working hours. Using data from the IAB Establishment Panel for the years 2008 to 2024, we investigate working-time adjustments after exit from collective bargaining. We find that exit is associated with only a modest increase in weekly working hours of around 0.3 to 0.6 per cent using fixed-effects and event-study models, corresponding to eight to thirteen additional minutes per week. This adjustment occurs shortly after leaving collective bargaining coverage. We further find no evidence that other margins of working-time adjustment, such as Saturday or Sunday work, are used more extensively after exit. In contrast to previous survey evidence, our findings call into question that working-hours constraints are one of the main drivers of exit from collective bargaining coverage.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Linear Demand Systems are Consistent with Discrete Choice
Afonso Rodrigues
On the Optimality of Mental Accounting
Jarrod Burgh, Emerson Melo, Matthew Shum
Microfinance Competition in the Presence of Moneylenders: Theory and Evidence
Shyamal Chowdhury, Prabal Roy Chowdhury, Joeri Smits
Who Leads and Who Collects:Algorithmic Collusion in Markets of Heterogeneous Language Models
Jun Yeong Lee
Risk Ceilings and Development Deadlines: Pacing AI under Uncertain Safety Productivity
Li Gan
The Gendered Impacts of Perceived Skin Tone: Evidence from African American Siblings in 1870-1940
Ran Abramitzky, Jacob Conway, Roy Mill et al.