SwingGuard: Risk-Conditioned Multi-Agent Swing Trading with Dual-Timescale Governance
Junzhou Su, Yichen Luo, Yebo Feng, Teng Li, Jiahua Xu
Abstract
Cryptocurrency swing trading spans mismatched timescales: positions remain active while market and event risk can change within minutes. However, many predictive and large language model (LLM)-based trading systems assess risk after strategy generation or run both functions at the same cadence, leaving proposals unconditioned by current risk and exposure weakly governed between revisions. We propose SwingGuard, a dual-timescale, long-only multi-agent framework for risk-conditioned strategy generation. At the strategy timescale, specialized analysts synthesize point-in-time technical, sentiment, on-chain, and macroeconomic evidence through bullish-bearish deliberation. The resulting evidence and current risk context are then combined by a Portfolio Architect to form a target position. At the governance timescale, a five-minute Risk Controller performs conditional diagnosis, maintains persistent risk states with staged recovery, audits the proposal, and constrains execution until the next strategy revision. This design allows risk to shape the feasible strategy before proposal finalization while continuing to govern the active position afterward. Evaluations on Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) show that SwingGuard preserves positive returns after transaction costs while maintaining shallow drawdowns and strong risk-adjusted performance on both assets. The exposure-capped joint portfolio achieves a Sharpe ratio of 2.98, compared with 2.79 for an otherwise identical Post-hoc Risk variant. Structured traces further link risk evidence and state transitions to strategy constraints and executed position changes, providing an auditable framework for asynchronous cryptocurrency swing trading. Overall, the results indicate that conditioning strategy formation on current risk, together with persistent high-frequency governance, improves risk-adjusted performance without sacrificing auditability.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Ask Your Advisor: Learning When to Consult Stronger Models in Agentic Systems
Pascal Sowietzki, Steffen Holter, Yannick Metz et al.
OpenSocialJax: Evaluating Social Adaptation in Sequential Social Dilemmas with Open-Ended Environmental Dynamics
Zihao Guo, Meng Fang, Joel Z. Leibo et al.
Collective Autonomous Vehicle Routing Needs Social Awareness for Coexistence with Human Drivers
Anastasia Psarou, Mikolaj Rams, Blazej Torbus et al.
When AI Advisors Agree: Distinguishing Forecast Risk from Forecast Reliability
Russlan Ramdowar
The Limits of Manipulation within Personalized Incentive Policies
Andrea Araldo, Alessa Mayer, Ravi Seshadri et al.
How Do Hardware Faults Manifest Differently in LLM Agents?
Aiden Rubey, Zachary Coalson, Cong Chen et al.