OC-AND: A Citation-Enriched Benchmark for Author Name Disambiguation
Francesca Cappelli, Giovanni Colavizza, Silvio Peroni
Abstract
Author Name Disambiguation benchmarks are predominantly derived from closed infrastructures that may not reflect conditions in open bibliographic environments. We present OC-AND, an open citation-enriched benchmark for AND constructed by remapping the WhoIsWho dataset with bibliographic and citation metadata from OpenCitations. The dataset is produced through a reproducible five-stage pipeline involving DOI verification, metadata validation, OpenCitations enrichment, and author-centric transformation. OC-AND retains the WhoIsWho ground-truth files and partition structure unchanged, while its publication files are restricted to publications that could be matched to a validated DOI and an OpenCitations record. It introduces realistic characteristics of open environments: heterogeneous metadata completeness, absent abstracts and affiliations, asymmetric citation coverage, and sparse graph connectivity. The dataset contains author records with associated citations, enabling evaluation of AND methods in settings closer to real-world open scholarly infrastructure scenarios. OC-AND is released as open data with complete provenance documentation and pipeline code, supporting reproducible research and the development of citation-aware disambiguation approaches.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A precision-driven evaluation protocol for author name disambiguation
Francesca Cappelli, Giovanni Colavizza, Silvio Peroni
Life after delisting: tracking the publication output and citation impact of Scopus-discontinued journals with OpenAlex
Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo, Fernando Sánchez-Pita
The Challenges of PROTAC Permeability Prediction
Lukáš Hudec, Rocío Mercado
Citations Are Late: Reading epistemic instability from what papers believe, years before the citation graph catches up
Andrey Ustyuzhanin, Ekaterina Trofimova, Denis Zuenko
Large scientific teams are more, not less, disruptive
Junming Huang, Yu Xie
Errors of LLM-Assisted Literature Retrieval in Environmental Science: A Comparison Study of Abstract versus Full-text Based Prompts
Yanjun Chen, Yongfeng Zhang, Lanjing Zhang