Defective, Amplified, Contested: Folk Conceptualizations of AI Slop

Abstract

AI slop has flooded social media feeds with overprocessed and derivative content--Jesus fusing with a shrimp, a humanoid orange chubby cat shoplifting, and a "hero" dog rescuing a human child after a plane crash. This might be no laughing matter, as waves of media coverage have taken a distinctly negative bent, emphasizing its low quality, ethical concerns, and threats to human creativity. Despite extensive attention from politicians and technologists, the perspectives of everyday users--the very audience most exposed to this phenomenon--remain largely unexplored. This descriptive work explored how Reddit users experience, conceptualize and contest AI slop. Inductive thematic analysis of posts and comments across six slop-related subreddits identified four themes covering constitutional defects, algorithmic overreach, user resistance, and entertainment outcomes--ranging from anxieties about eroding agency, moral norms, creativity, and existential questions to defensive distinctions between quality AI content and slop. We derive a user-driven definition: AI slop is audience-contested AI-generated content characterized by constitutional defects and enabled by platform logics. We operationalize slop through a facet-theoretical framework to inform future research into this fuzzy category.