Bipartite Carrier Compression and Machine-Certified Bounds in Schönhage Trilinear Multiplication Tensors
Volkan Dağlı, Zerrin Dağlı, Dağhan Dağlı
Abstract
Under the conditional framework breaking the longstanding O(n log n) integer multiplication barrier (originating from OpenAI Preprint #109), the asymptotic time complexity exponent T(n) = O(n (log n)1-κ) is governed by bounding the second moment E[X2] < 1 of recursive branching processes over trilinear tensor carrier graphs. In this work, we present a constructive combinatorial optimization over the alternating carrier bipartite matching graphs of the Schönhage trilinear tensor decomposition at dimensions h=23 and h=25. Through an alternating augmenting path search, we uncover a non-trivial cluster-unlocking cascade that eliminates 185 carrier roles (95 roles in h=23 and 90 roles in h=25), reducing the global physical wire width by 377,890 wires from the reviewed baseline W = 177,284,805 down to W = 176,906,915. Evaluated over the exact 10-14 rational grid, this wire reduction certifies an improved second-moment coefficient AB = 5,164,059 / 125,000,000,000 and establishes the sharpened conditional exponent κ= 826,215,307 / 20,000,000,000,000 ≈ 4.131076535 × 10-5, strictly surpassing the preceding record on this architecture (κ≈ 4.123864 × 10-5). All 47 polynomial constraints and 7 rational security margins are audited in exact Q-arithmetic with zero floating-point error, and the fundamental wire reduction identity is formally verified in the Lean 4 interactive theorem prover without unproven axioms.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A simplified proof of polynomial improvements for 3SUM and APSP
Sankeerth Rao Karingula, Shachar Lovett
Saving the Queen is hard: Hive is EXPTIME-complete
Francesco Carboni, Daniele Muscillo
Unconditional Separation between LL and CLL
Shubham Bhardwaj
Execution-Time Opacity in (Controllable) Timed Automata is Hard
Sarah Dépernet, Engel Lefaucheux
Constant-Loss Round-Preserving Direct Sums for Information Complexity
Haoran Wang
How far is Kolmogorov-Loveland randomness from Martin-Löf randomness?
Tomislav Petrović