AI Meets Turbulence Modeling: Complex Systems Perspective
Sharath S. Girimaji
Abstract
Despite widespread enthusiasm, applying artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) to turbulence modeling has yielded only modest progress, primarily due to a lack of situation-aware deployment. Data-driven Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes (ML-RANS) closures frequently fail to generalize across diverse flow regimes, while scale-resolving simulations (SRS) remain computationally prohibitive. As a result, ML-RANS is often misapplied outside its domain of validity, and ML-SRS is unnecessarily deployed on flows fully amenable to RANS. To guide optimal AI/ML deployment, we propose a turbulence taxonomy map parameterized by degrees of freedom (Re) and the degree of non-equilibrium (SK/ε). By applying Weaver's well-recognized complexity framework, we classify turbulence into distinct physical regimes. This categorization identifies where local ML-RANS surrogates can generalize, clarifies where explicit scale resolution is physically mandatory, and highlights where physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are most effective. Ultimately, this perspective establishes a physics-grounded framework for the flow-aware, successful deployment of AI/ML in turbulence.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Wave-driven geostrophic vortices in rotating turbulence
Vladimir Parfenyev, Sergey Vergeles
Capillary-gravity wave resistance of a translating, pulsating source
Haim Diamant, Elie Raphael
Nanofluid transport in Taylor bubble flows
Fahad Al-Gburi, Faysal Khaleel, Yulong Ding et al.
Identification of effective transport physics and optimal feedback control: Experimental demonstration on a 1600-fan wind generator
Tamir Shaqarin, Izz Al-Manasra, TianXiang Zhang et al.
Local sensing of gas microflows using a levitated nanoparticle
Maxime Debiossac, David Grass, Daniel R. Ladiges et al.
Numerical Modeling of a Metallic Alloy Droplet Impact, Solidification, and Macrosegregation
Ehsan Amani, Ali Moinirad