GeONet: Geometry-Encoded Operator Network for Predicting Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media
Md Lal Mamud, Maruti K. Mudunuru, Yucheng Fu, Aramy Troung, Satish Karra, Ivani Patel, Arunima Bhattacharjee, Tamas Varga, Pratanu Roy, Michael Penwarden, Rajesh K. Singh, Arjun Chakrawal, Kalyana B. Nakshatrala, Christof Meile, Erin Rooney, Glenn Hammond
Abstract
Rapid prediction of pressure-driven flow in microfluidic porous media is important for experimental design, tracer-test interpretation, and digital-twin development for subsurface energy and critical mineral applications. High-fidelity simulations resolve geometry-controlled flow but are computationally expensive across large geometry ensembles. Here, we introduce GeONet, a Geometry-Encoded Operator Network that predicts steady-state pressure fields by jointly representing material properties, spatial coordinates, and solid--void geometry. GeONet extends the Branch--Trunk architecture with a dedicated Leaf Network encoding the binary domain mask through multiscale features. The Branch Network represents porosity and permeability, the Trunk Network combines coordinates with local geometric descriptors and random Fourier features, and a gated DeepMixer integrates these representations to predict pressure. GeONet was trained and evaluated using 5,000 PFLOTRAN simulations of heterogeneous Reduced Complexity Platform domains, comprising nearly 30 TB of data. Comparisons with pore-scale Stokes solutions across three geometries yielded Pearson correlations of 0.987--0.991 and R2 values of 0.974--0.982, supporting PFLOTRAN as reference data. Under matched partitions and two-stage hyperparameter optimization, GeONet substantially outperformed a boundary-condition-aware DeepONet baseline. Across three held-out domains, GeONet achieved NRMSE of 0.0381--0.0500, MAPE of 1.76--2.59%, and R2 of 0.9673--0.9822, versus 0.1483--0.2040, 7.81--10.45%, and 0.5658--0.7126 for DeepONet, respectively. On three additional unseen geometries, GeONet achieved NRMSE of 0.0448--0.0676 and R2 of 0.9511--0.9770. These results demonstrate improved accuracy, pressure-range preservation, and cross-geometry generalization through explicit geometry encoding.
Create a lesson
Related papers
LAO+: Focused, Multi-Replica Accelerated Orthogonal Sampling for Robust Binding Free Energy Predictions
Narjes Ansari, Florent Hédin, Jérôme Hénin et al.
Learning to reconstruct Germano Differential Filtered Fields with Convolutional Neural Networks for Large Eddy Simulation of Plasma Turbulence
Jony Castagna, Josh Williams
Online reduced-order modeling from primal solver trajectories for PDE-constrained optimization
Zhe Lu, Wenbo Cao, Weiwei Zhang
A nonequilibrium-capturing unified gas-kinetic scheme I: discrete orthogonal basis construction and expansion on velocity space
Hongyu Liu, Kun Xu
Standardized Planck-Mean Absorption Coefficients for High-Temperature Gases
Ryan D. DeBoskey, Clayton M. Geipel, Brian T. Bojko
A deep energy method formulation for phase-field modelling of ductile fracture
Nojus Plungė, Peter Brommer, Rachel S. Edwards et al.