Creating SquashFS Images to Support HPC and AI Datasets
Julie Mullen, Albert Reuther, LaToya Anderson, Michael Jones, William Arcand, William Bergeron, David Bestor, Alex Bonn, Daniel Burrill, Chansup Byun, Vijay Gadepally, Michael Houle, Matthew Hubbell, Hayden Jananthan, Piotr Luszczek, Peter Michaleas, Guillermo Morales, Andrew Prout, Antonio Rosa, Chuck Yee, Jeremy Kepner
Abstract
HPC users often download datasets on HPC systems for analysis and processing. When these datasets are comprised of hundreds of thousands (or more) of small files, accessing them in parallel can put a tremendous burden on the metadata servers of central parallel file systems. If the dataset is read-only, an effective solution is to compress the dataset into a SquashFS image. There are, however, a number of workflows that can be used to create such a dataset image, and we observed that some were more efficient than others. To provide more effective guidance for our userbase, we benchmarked eleven different workflows for creating SquashFS dataset image files of datasets with thousands to millions of very small files. We took into account whether the data arrived as tar.gz, zip, or files-and-directories downloads, whether the image creation was on the central file system or local compute node storage, and the number of SquashFS file compression threads used. This paper shares the results of these benchmarks and provides recommendations to HPC system users toward the best workflows to use for SquashFS image creation.
Create a lesson
Related papers
XViewRank: Overlap-Conditioned Score Fusion for LLM-Augmented Sparse Retrieval
Xinxuan Lv, Minghan Li, Guodong Zhou
Reading the Neighborhood: Text-Attentive Graph Reranking for Automated Subject Indexing
Lakshmi Rajendram Bashyam, Ralf Krestel
Twenty Days Later: A Pre-Registered Test of History-Based Forecasts of Brand Mentions in Gemini Answers
Dmitrij Żatuchin
Bridging the Topological Divide: Dual-Branch Graph Distillation with Semantic Priors for Robust Cold-Start Recommendation
Yuanfeng Qiu
RCER: Reconstructing Cross-Evidence Relations for Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Linyao Zheng, Xuhang Shi, Zhifang Mao et al.
Revisiting Generative vs. Dense Retrieval: A Static Value Prior Reverses the Gap
Renbo Tu, Yang Liu, Shuying Sun