On Knowledge Compilation Languages for QBFs
Sravanthi Chede, Vaibhav Krishan, Anil Shukla
Abstract
In this work, we design knowledge compilation languages for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs), with a particular focus on model counting. We introduce various languages in increasing order of their power of representation, starting from a simple tree-based structure, and extending it to DAGs for a more efficient representation. We study the power and limitations of each language. We also show that QBF queries such as model counting and MaxQBF are easy to handle in all these languages. These languages naturally lead to various static proof systems for the #QBF problem, the model-counting version of the QBF problem. We compare these systems with one another and with a recently introduced line-based #QBF-system called Q-MICE (Chede, Chew, Krishan and Shukla, SAT `26). We show that a minor extension of the Q-MICE system efficiently simulates all these static proof systems, and is in fact exponentially stronger than each of them. We also initiate the implementation of a solver based on these languages. The solver compiles a representation of an input QBF in the proposed tree-like language, which is subsequently used for model counting. This is the first knowledge compilation based solver for #QBF which can handle QBFs with doubly exponential model counts as well. Experimentally, we compare its performance with the state-of-the-art #QBF-solver d4-QBF which works well for QBFs with small model counts.
Create a lesson
Related papers
An Optimal Gap-Majority Lemma for Bounded Rounds Communication
Pachara Sawettamalya
The Six-Dimensional Tarski Problem is Ω(3 n)-Hard
Kristóf Zólomy
Metric Dimension is NP-complete on Graphs of Treewidth Two
Tristan Benoit
On Complexity of Gaussian Sampling
Huanjian Zhou, Taiji Suzuki
Asymmetry and Complexity of Nondeterministic Computations
Halley Goldberg, Jinqiao Hu, Zhenjian Lu et al.
The Two-Level Poset Game is PSPACE-Complete
Kengo Hashimoto