Fixed Sets and the Hardness of Computing Correlated Equilibria
Ioannis Anagnostides, Constantinos Daskalakis, Gabriele Farina, Noah Golowich, Tuomas Sandholm, Brian Hu Zhang
Abstract
We show that computing an approximate correlated equilibrium of a polytope game is PPAD-complete, and thus polynomial-time equivalent to finding a Nash equilibrium. This challenges the conventional view in game theory that correlated equilibria are more tractable objects than Nash equilibria. From a conceptual standpoint, we connect correlated equilibria to a natural generalization of fixed points, which we call fixed sets. A fixed set of a continuous function f is a nonempty finite set S such that S ⊂eq conv f(S). Our main technical contribution is to prove that computing a fixed set is PPAD-hard even at inverse polynomial precision.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Exact Envy-Free Cake Cutting with Polynomial Expected Queries
Simon Mackenzie, Mashbat Suzuki
Subjective Valuations Make It Hard to be Fair: The Complexity of Resource Allocation to Groups of Agents
Argyrios Deligkas, Eduard Eiben, Robert Ganian et al.
Best-of-Both Worlds Proportionality in Structured Committee Elections
Dimitris Avramidis, Mark de Berg, Ulrike Schmidt-Kraepelin
Extending Mechanisms
Sergiu Hart, Noam Nisan
Simple Strategy-Iteration with Dantzig's Rule is not Strongly Polynomial on Turn-Based Deterministic Games
Sanyou Mei
Fundamental Impossibility Results in AI Safety: Trading Off between Desiderata
Ida Mattsson, Ratip Emin Berker, Emanuel Tewolde et al.