EnvSched: Environment-Aware Scheduling for Rollout-Efficient Agent Reinforcement Learning
Sihan Yang, Weichen Bai, Ruichuan An, Yiming Cheng, Zhiyuan Feng, Tianyi Jiang, Renye Yan, Ning Ding, Yifan Zhang, Renrui Zhang, Yehui Tang, Wentao Zhang
Abstract
As executable environments for language agents scale, generating and verifying their rollouts becomes increasingly expensive. Under finite rollout budgets, this raises an important question: can data management at the environment level make agentic reinforcement learning (RL) more efficient by organizing, evaluating, and scheduling task instances together with the environments that determine their tools, states, transitions, and verification? To address this question, we introduce EnvSched (Environment-aware Scheduling), an online scheduler that learns from rollout history. EnvSched assigns scheduling value through two complementary modeling choices: exploitation prioritizes tasks likely to provide informative reward differences, while coverage spreads each batch across underobserved environments and interaction patterns. EnvSched organizes environment--task pairs as nodes in a dual-relation graph, with within-environment edges capturing task semantics and shared tool, state, and verifier structure, and cross-environment edges capturing abstract execution and reward topology. By propagating historical rollout statistics along both edge types, it predicts within-task reward variance. These predictions guide a scheduler that allocates each batch to tasks with high predicted reward variance and underobserved environments and tasks. Environment quotas and a similarity penalty further limit concentration and redundancy, yielding informative and diverse batches without additional pilot rollouts. In RL on Qwen3-8B, EnvSched achieves an average score of 48.81 across BFCL-v3, tau-Bench, and ACEBench-Agent after 40 training steps, exceeding the highest score attained by random task selection after 120 steps. It also improves downstream performance across model sizes at the same training budget.
Create a lesson
Related papers
When Should We Intervene at Test Time?
Jiahao Zhang, Xinling Wen, Liangliang Li et al.
Heads of Security: Learned Attention Gates Improve Prompt Injection Robustness
Igor Shilov, Xiaoxue Yang, Alexander Panfilov et al.
Attention as Lattice Gauge Theory: Relations Interact Only Through Wilson Loops
Aakash Sarkar, Ananya Mukherjee, Motoshige Sato
Scaling Laws for Tool-Use Agents via Controllable Environment Synthesis
Andrew Szot, Samira Abnar, Omar Attia et al.
MuonGS: Pretraining LLMs with Relaxed Weight-Norm Control
Athanasios Glentis, Dawei Li, Mingyi Hong
GAS-PFN: Graph-Aware Spatiotemporal Prior-Data Fitted Networks for Zero-Shot Traffic Forecasting
Joseph Natter, Long Vu, Yifan Zhang et al.