Engineering process plants as code in the age of agentic AI
Artur M. Schweidtmann, Davy Demeyer
Abstract
Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) could one day shorten process plant engineering from years to weeks. Today, however, plant information is scattered across documents and tools and must be carried between them by hand, so an AI agent placed into current workflows inherits the same silos. In this Comment, we argue for Plant-as-Code: defining the engineering of a plant as a version-controlled collection of machine-readable files that follow, where possible, existing standards such as DEXPI and IFC. On this foundation, Design-Ops extends DevOps principles to plant engineering, linking every engineering item to the information it derives from and replacing manual checking with automated tests. Agents can then coordinate routine work across disciplines while deterministic tools perform the calculations. Verification sets the pace: agents propose, tools check, and engineers review and authorize every change. We outline the risks of this shift and the research, industry and policy actions it requires.
Create a lesson
Related papers
TRACER, a time-to-event EHR foundation model for disease detection across health systems
Mara Pleasure, Ekaterina Redekop, Vedrana Ivezic et al.
Unweaving the mechanics of woven fabrics through automated model discovery
Marin Lauber, Uzair Manack, Thibault Vervenne et al.
Counting approximate breakpoint medians of random genomes
Poly H. da Silva, Arash Jamshidpey, David Sankoff
PCM: A Proof-Carrying Message Protocol for Verifiable Multi-Agent Communication
Bravish Ghosh
Data Driven Modeling of a Magnetic Newton's Cradle using the Optimization of a Discrete Loss
Dimitris Koumoutsakos, Sergey Litvinov
Comparing wins above replacement across baseball history
Michael Doane