Early career researcher responses to AI in math
Anna Brandenberger, Hanna Mularczyk, Dora Woodruff
Abstract
We've heard a lot about AI in math from Fields medalists, AI labs, and established professors. However, the personal stakes are highest for early career researchers. Hoping to provide a platform for graduate students and postdocs to voice their opinions, concerns, and experiences, we wrote and distributed a survey on AI in math. In this article, we share the responses to our survey. All responses are anonymous, and respondents came from almost 60 institutions and at least 5 countries. Our survey included both multiple choice questions and more open-ended free response questions. If you are a senior mathematician or university administrator reading these survey results, our goal is for you to understand the concerns of the younger generations and use your authority to take action accordingly. If you are an early career mathematician reading these survey results, we hope you find comfort in the knowledge that your experiences are shared by many others. If you are not a mathematician, we hope you come away from this article with a deeper understanding of the goals, values, and concerns of the community.
Create a lesson
Related papers
It is time for a New Deal for mathematics
Nestor Guillen
Around the Clock. New Twists on Fitch Cheney's Five-Card Trick
Doron Levy, Yaakov Malinovsky
Two teams that cancel: a didactic analysis of a teaching progression for signed numbers from Grade 5 to Grade 7
Vincent Tariel-Adam
Letter to a Young Black Mathematician: History, Storytelling, and Belonging in Mathematics
Ranthony A. Clark
A Diophantine generalization of Fourier's irrationality trick
Archan Chattopadhyay, Chandan Chattopadhyay
Mathematical Reality Capture: from the age of discoveries to mathematical topography and surveys
Daniele Corradetti