XDecideBench: Evaluating Typed Decision Models and Confidence Policies Across Languages

Abstract

Applications use Typed Decision Models to route and moderate text in many languages, and they often act only on decisions above a confidence threshold. We introduce XDecideBench, a benchmark of nine suites in 122 languages with 88,425 texts and 153,875 typed questions. All suites share one scoring contract, and we report aligned, locally labelled and native items separately. Model rankings change from suite to suite. The model that is best in English, chosen in hindsight, loses significantly in about a quarter of the suite-language cells, and on Burmese Belebele it falls far behind the best model. Three open models fine-tuned for typed decisions beat the Qwen models they were built from in all twelve development languages. When the Qwen models are run locally, a pre-registered held-out cohort confirms that the accuracy gain is larger in the four languages with the least web text than in the six with the most. In both sets of languages, however, fine-tuning fixes a similar share of the base model's errors, so the larger gain may reflect weaker base models. A confidence threshold set on English data to allow 5% errors exceeds that error rate on XNLI, even in German and French.