TIGER: Learning from Researcher Taste to Generate Tailored Research Ideas
Shane Gu, Yufeng Lin, Dixi Yao, Xuchen Gong, Chenhao Tan
Abstract
In pairwise comparisons where each judge chooses between an idea generated by its corresponding TIGER-8B policy and one generated by GPT-4.1, the three LLM researchers select the TIGER-8B idea in 56.6%-68.4% of 76 comparisons per researcher. PhD1 and PhD2 select the TIGER-8B idea in 19 of 30 pairs (63.3%) and 17 of 30 pairs (56.7%), respectively. All six directed cross-policy comparisons likewise favor the judge's matched TIGER-8B policy over an off-target policy, supporting the use of individual preference feedback for tailored research ideation.
Create a lesson
Related papers
OSGR: Observation-Support Graph Reasoning for Earth Observation Question Answering
Dazhou Yu, Zerong Wang, Riyang Bao et al.
Bidirectional Centered Score Matching for Discrete Diffusion Distillation
Peng Tu, Baoyou Chen, Haoyuan Xia et al.
Harness-S: Learning from Sibling Harnesses for Generalizable Agent Training
Kangning Zhang, Wenxiang Jiao, Bowen Fang et al.
Reliability Stress Testing of RAG Retrieval under Query-Relevant Corpus Poisoning
Janet Sung, Kainan Zhou, Gangzhen Qian et al.
Neologism Inoculation Prompting
David Demitri Africa, Cameron Holmes
AceAction-5M: Hierarchical Goals for Generalist Action Learning Across 3D Game Worlds
Kailing Li, Ruoxuan Zhang, Zheyuan Zhou et al.