VerfGraph: Efficient Zero-Knowledge Verifiable Graph Query Evaluation System
Tianyi Ma, Yuncong Zhang, Yuanzhuo Yu, Boshi Yuan, Shi-Feng Sun
Abstract
Graph databases are often used to manage relationship-rich data, whose graph structure and attributes may be sensitive. In many applications, a database owner or a service provider evaluates queries over a private graph for a client. Because the graph cannot be fully disclosed and independently re-executing the query may be impractical, the client cannot directly verify the returned result. This creates a need for verifiable graph query evaluation that preserves data confidentiality. We present VerfGraph, a zero-knowledge system for verifiable graph query evaluation, which enables a client to verify that the query result was correctly computed over a committed graph data, without revealing private graph records or intermediate query values beyond the public inputs and what is implied by the query result. Building on the expansion-centric model introduced by the state-of-the-art zero-knowledge verifiable graph query evaluation system ZKGraph (ICDE'26), VerfGraph achieves more efficient and expressive zero-knowledge verifiable graph query evaluation by advancing design in two key ways. First, we propose novel operator-proof methods for core expansion and shortest-path operations that reduce costly sorting and comparison checks and eliminate edge canonicalization for bidirectional expansion. Furthermore, we introduce correctness proofs for count and weighted shortest-path operators, broadening the class of graph queries that can be verified. We evaluate VerfGraph using the LDBC Social Network Benchmark. Compared with ZKGraph on complex IC queries, VerfGraph achieves 33.9×-59.7× speedups in proof generation and reduces peak prover memory by factors of 4.5×-6.6×, while maintaining millisecond-level verification and producing sub-MB proofs.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Bilateral Protection for Private LoRA Inference with Intel TDX
Xiaodong Li, Mingyuan Ma, Dongbo Yan
Can Benign Skills Induce Misaligned Behavior in LLM Agents?
Xuanye Zhang, Yongsen Zheng, Kaiyu Zhou et al.
The Native Menace: Host-to-Browser Cross-Boundary Attacks via Native Messaging
Jyotirmay Chauhan, Rownak Islam, Jason Polakis
When Debate Amplifies Risk: Social-Bias Vulnerabilities in Multi-Agent Safety Deliberation
Qinghua Mao, Xi Lin, Yuxin Qi et al.
ScrambleMark: Zero-Query Watermark-Agnostic Black-Box Evasion of Modern Speech Watermarking
Binhao Ma, Weikang Ding, Hanqing Guo et al.
Permitted but Unauthorized: Affordance-Induced Delegated-Scope Violations in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
Shravya Kanchi