Dull, Dirty, Dangerous? Working Conditions and the Limits of Occupational AI Exposure
Siyi Yu
Abstract
Automation is often justified as relief from dull, dirty, and dangerous work. I examine how these conditions relate to occupational AI exposure using 21 O*NET items across 754 US occupations. Higher exposure is associated with lower condition scores under a large language model (LLM) measure and AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE), with equal occupation weights and employment weights. Adjustment for physical demands, required education, training and experience, and wages reduces the composite association. The adjusted confidence intervals include zero for LLM exposure and remain below zero for AIOE. Separating repetition from restricted discretion also changes what the combined Dull score conveys. These comparisons show how item groupings and occupational characteristics shape the interpretation of exposure estimates. Occupational profiles offer a starting point for selecting contrasting research settings. Establishing desired automation or realized relief requires evidence about workers' preferences and specific interventions.
Create a lesson
Related papers
BEAKER: An Expert-Curated Benchmark for Embodied Brains in Self-Driving Chemical Laboratories
Fei Lin, Tengchao Zhang, Ziyang Gong et al.
FrontierPhysics: Evaluating Agents for End-to-End Physics Research
Bingran You, Wenjun Ke, Ria Rosenauer et al.
Learning to Decode Linear Codes with Generalized Belief Propagation Network
Samira Malek
On Turn-Level Best-of-N Sampling for Scaling LLM Agents
Jalaj Bhandari, Dhawal Gupta, Hongli Zhan et al.
CompressionBench: How can your coding agents compress LLMs?
Xinrui Zhong, Zhifeng Li, Zhiming Wang et al.
ServerBench: How can your coding agents design specialized LLM serving systems?
Xinrui Zhong, Zhiming Wang, Yongqi Liu et al.