On a problem due to Erdős concerning w1(n)
John M. Campbell
Abstract
Adopting notation from Erdős [Congress. Numer., 1980], we define w1(n) = w(n) for positive integers n so that w(1) = 0 and so that: If n > 1 and n = Π pαp, then w(n) = Σpαp n npαp. By then defining V(x)=|\w(n):1 n x\| for x ≥ 1, Erdős considered whether or not V(x) = o(x) and left this as an open problem. This same problem was also given as an open problem in Guy's famous textbook on unsolved problems in number theory and seems to have remained open. We solve this problem by proving that V(x) ≠ o(x), and, moreover, by proving the stronger result such that x ∞ V(x)x > 0.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Towards a twistless converse theorem
Andrew R. Booker, Min Lee, Nina Zubrilina
The minimal excludant and the least r-gaps of -regular partitions
Tejash Priya, Sourav Bhowmick, Nabin Kumar Meher
A Hypergeometric RM Surface: Integral Monodromy and Level-11 Covers
Devendra Tiwari
Multivariable Congruence Jumping: Periodic States, Integral Realizations, and Descent
Max A. Alekseyev, Dmitry I. Khomovsky
Periodic counting, carry synchronization, and primes in nonstandard numeration systems
Nian Hong Zhou
On explicit units in a family of cubic fields and the arithmetic of curves arising from powers of these units
Iwao Kimura, Hikaru Umemoto