Comment on "Self-organized criticality in living systems" by C. Adami
M. E. J. Newman, Simon M. Fraser, Kim Sneppen, William A. Tozier
Abstract
Following extensive numerical experiments, it has been suggested that the evolution of competing computer programs in artificial life simulations shows signs of being a self-organized critical process. The primary evidence for this claim comes from the distribution of the lifetimes of species in the simulations, which appears to follow a power law. We argue that, for a number of reasons, it is unlikely that the system is in fact at a critical point and suggest an alternative explanation for the power-law lifetime distribution.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Amplifying Phenomenal Information: Toward a Fundamental Theory of Consciousness
L. Gabora
Cumulant Dynamics of a Population under Multiplicative Selection, Mutation and Drift
Magnus Rattray, Jonathan L. Shapiro
A microsimulation of traders activity in the stock market: the role of heterogeneity, agents' interactions and trade frictions
Giulia Iori
Number-conserving cellular automaton rules
Nino Boccara, Henryk Fuks
The Importance of Being Discrete - Life Always Wins on the Surface
Nadav M. Shnerb, Yoram Louzoun, Eldad Bettelheim et al.
Fitness versus Longevity in Age-Structured Population Dynamics
W. Hwang, P. L. Krapivsky, S. Redner