Democracy versus Dictatorship in Self-Organized Models of Financial Markets
R. d'Hulst, G. J. Rodgers
Abstract
Models to mimic the transmission of information in financial markets are introduced. As an attempt to generate the demand process, we distinguish between dictatorship associations, where groups of agents rely on one of them to make decision, and democratic associations, where each agent takes part in the group decision. In the dictatorship model, agents segregate into two distinct populations, while the democratic model is driven towards a critical state where groups of agents of all sizes exist. Hence, both models display a level of organization, but only the democratic model is self-organized. We show that the dictatorship model generates less volatile markets than the democratic model.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Amplifying Phenomenal Information: Toward a Fundamental Theory of Consciousness
L. Gabora
Cumulant Dynamics of a Population under Multiplicative Selection, Mutation and Drift
Magnus Rattray, Jonathan L. Shapiro
A microsimulation of traders activity in the stock market: the role of heterogeneity, agents' interactions and trade frictions
Giulia Iori
Number-conserving cellular automaton rules
Nino Boccara, Henryk Fuks
The Importance of Being Discrete - Life Always Wins on the Surface
Nadav M. Shnerb, Yoram Louzoun, Eldad Bettelheim et al.
Fitness versus Longevity in Age-Structured Population Dynamics
W. Hwang, P. L. Krapivsky, S. Redner