On dust-correlated Galactic emission in the Tenerife data

Abstract

Recently correlation analyses between Galactic dust emission templates and a number of CMB data sets have led to differing claims on the origin of the Galactic contamination at low frequencies. de Oliviera-Costa et al (1999) have presented work based on Tenerife data supporting the spinning dust hypothesis. Since the frequency coverage of these data is ideal to discriminate spectrally between spinning dust and free-free emission, we used the latest version of the Tenerife data, which have lower systematic uncertainty, to study the correlation in more detail. We found however that the evidence in favor of spinning dust originates from a small region at low Galactic latitude where the significance of the correlation itself is low and is compromised by systematic effects in the Galactic plane signal. The rest of the region was found to be uncorrelated. Regions that correlate with higher significance tend to have a steeper spectrum, as is expected for free-free emission. Averaging over all correlated regions yields dust-correlation coefficients of 18047 and 12316 μK /MJy sr-1 at 10 and 15 GHz respectively. These numbers however have large systematic uncertainties that we have identified and care should be taken when comparing with results from other experiments. We do find evidence for synchrotron emission with spectral index steepening from radio to microwave frequencies, but we cannot make conclusive claims about the origin of the dust-correlated component based on the spectral index estimates. Data with higher sensitivity are required to decide about the significance of the dust-correlation at high Galactic latitudes and other Galactic templates, in particular Hα maps, will be necessary for constraining its origin.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…