On the difference between nuclear and contraction ages

Abstract

Context:Ages derived from the low mass stars still contracting onto the main sequence often differ from ages derived from the high mass ones that have already evolved away from it. Aims:We investigate the general claim of disagreement between these two independent age determinations by presenting UBVRI photometry of the young galactic open clusters NGC 2232, NGC 2516, NGC 2547 and NGC 4755, spanning the age range ~10-150 Myr Methods: We derive reddenings, distances and nuclear ages by fitting ZAMS and isochrones to color-magnitudes and color-color diagrams. To derive contraction ages, we use four different pre-main sequence models, with an empirically calibrated color-temperature relation to match the Pleiades cluster sequence. Results: When using exclusively the V vs. V-I color-magnitude diagram and empirically calibrated isochrones, there is consistency between nuclear and contraction ages for the studied clusters. Although the contraction ages seem systematically underestimated, in none of cases they deviate by more than one standard deviation from the nuclear ages.