Low Mass X-Ray Binaries in Globular Clusters: A New Metallicity Effect

Abstract

Galactic Globular Clusters (GCs) containing bright X sources (Lx > 1036 erg/s), commonly associated with Low Mass X-Ray Binaries (LMXBs), are found to be significantly denser and more metal-rich than normal non-X-ray clusters both in the Galaxy and in M31. Within a framework where LMXBs in GCs are generated via tidal captures in high-density clusters and (2+1) encounters in low-density globulars, the higher incidence of LMXBs with increasing metallicity is shown to be intrinsic and not just a by-product of other effects. Two possible mechanisms are examined: the first one assumes a dependence of the cluster IMF on metallicity as recently published in the literature. The observed LMBXs, more frequently occurring in metal rich clusters, agrees with the predicted number of NS only if metallicity accounts for a minor contribution to the observed variation of the IMF slope. Other alternatives explored, such as the total variation of the observed IMF slopes is due to (a) just metallicity and (b) the combination of metallicity and position in the Galaxy lead to a clear-cut disagreement with the data. The second mechanism assumes that, at fixed cluster density, the rate of tidal captures depends on radius and mass of the capturing star. Based on standard stellar models, stars with higher metal content have wider radii and higher masses, hence the rate of tidal captures increases with increasing metallicity. From the order of magnitude computations made, this new effect by itself could explain the observed ratio of 4 between the frequencies of X-ray clusters in the metal-rich and metal-poor groups we observationally determined. However, there is no reason to exclude that both mechanisms can be at work.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…