Multiple superbubbles in the starburst nucleus of NGC 5253? - Implications for mass loss from dwarf galaxies

Abstract

We obtained a long ROSAT HRI observation of the nearby dwarf starburst and Wolf-Rayet galaxy NGC 5253. Our aim was to resolve the source of the soft thermal X-ray emission seen by the ROSAT PSPC, proposed to be a luminous superbubble by Martin & Kennicutt (1995). Instead of a single superbubble, we find a complex of at least five sources of X-ray emission, associated with the massive clusters of young stars at the centre of NGC 5253. The individual 0.1-2.4 keV X-ray luminosities of the components lie in the range 2-7 times 1037 erg. Three of the components are statistically extended beyond the HRI PSF, the largest having a FWHM of 8 (+10,-4) arcsec, equivalent to 160 (+200, -80) pc. We consider the origin of the observed X-ray emission, concentrating on the sources expected to be associated with the starburst region: superbubbles, supernovae, supernova remnants and massive X-ray binaries. To assess the X-ray luminosity of a young superbubble blown by a single massive cluster of stars we perform hydrodynamical simulations with realistic time-varying mass and energy injection rates. We conclude that the extended X-ray components are most likely young superbubbles blown by individual young clusters in the starburst region. We discuss in detail the implications of multiple superbubbles on the efficiency of mass and metal ejection from dwarf galaxies by starburst driven galactic winds. We suggest the presence of multiple stellar clusters in starbursting dwarf galaxies and the resulting multiple superbubbles will reduce the total ISM mass ejected from from dwarf galaxies compared to the current models which only consider the blowout of a single superbubble (Abridged).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…