Resolution of Syntactic Ambiguity: the Case of New Subjects
Michael Niv
Abstract
I review evidence for the claim that syntactic ambiguities are resolved on the basis of the meaning of the competing analyses, not their structure. I identify a collection of ambiguities that do not yet have a meaning-based account and propose one which is based on the interaction of discourse and grammatical function. I provide evidence for my proposal by examining statistical properties of the Penn Treebank of syntactically annotated text.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A Memory-Based Approach to Learning Shallow Natural Language Patterns
Shlomo Argamon, Ido Dagan, Yuval Krymolowski
A Comparison of WordNet and Roget's Taxonomy for Measuring Semantic Similarity
Michael Mc Hale
Some Ontological Principles for Designing Upper Level Lexical Resources
Nicola Guarino
Towards an implementable dependency grammar
Timo Jarvinen, Pasi Tapanainen
A Variant of Earley Parsing
Mark-Jan Nederhof, Giorgio Satta
Segregatory Coordination and Ellipsis in Text Generation
James Shaw