A Comparison of Two Smoothing Methods for Word Bigram Models
Linda Bauman Peto
Abstract
A COMPARISON OF TWO SMOOTHING METHODS FOR WORD BIGRAM MODELS Linda Bauman Peto Department of Computer Science University of Toronto Abstract Word bigram models estimated from text corpora require smoothing methods to estimate the probabilities of unseen bigrams. The deleted estimation method uses the formula: Pr(i|j) = lambda fi + (1-lambda)fi|j, where fi and fi|j are the relative frequency of i and the conditional relative frequency of i given j, respectively, and lambda is an optimized parameter. MacKay (1994) proposes a Bayesian approach using Dirichlet priors, which yields a different formula: Pr(i|j) = (alpha/Fj + alpha) mi + (1 - alpha/Fj + alpha) fi|j where Fj is the count of j and alpha and mi are optimized parameters. This thesis describes an experiment in which the two methods were trained on a two-million-word corpus taken from the Canadian Hansard and compared on the basis of the experimental perplexity that they assigned to a shared test corpus. The methods proved to be about equally accurate, with MacKay's method using fewer resources.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A Memory-Based Approach to Learning Shallow Natural Language Patterns
Shlomo Argamon, Ido Dagan, Yuval Krymolowski
A Comparison of WordNet and Roget's Taxonomy for Measuring Semantic Similarity
Michael Mc Hale
Some Ontological Principles for Designing Upper Level Lexical Resources
Nicola Guarino
Towards an implementable dependency grammar
Timo Jarvinen, Pasi Tapanainen
A Variant of Earley Parsing
Mark-Jan Nederhof, Giorgio Satta
Segregatory Coordination and Ellipsis in Text Generation
James Shaw