NLG vs. Templates
Ehud Reiter
Abstract
One of the most important questions in applied NLG is what benefits (or `value-added', in business-speak) NLG technology offers over template-based approaches. Despite the importance of this question to the applied NLG community, however, it has not been discussed much in the research NLG community, which I think is a pity. In this paper, I try to summarize the issues involved and recap current thinking on this topic. My goal is not to answer this question (I don't think we know enough to be able to do so), but rather to increase the visibility of this issue in the research community, in the hope of getting some input and ideas on this very important question. I conclude with a list of specific research areas I would like to see more work in, because I think they would increase the `value-added' of NLG over templates.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A Memory-Based Approach to Learning Shallow Natural Language Patterns
Shlomo Argamon, Ido Dagan, Yuval Krymolowski
A Comparison of WordNet and Roget's Taxonomy for Measuring Semantic Similarity
Michael Mc Hale
Some Ontological Principles for Designing Upper Level Lexical Resources
Nicola Guarino
Towards an implementable dependency grammar
Timo Jarvinen, Pasi Tapanainen
A Variant of Earley Parsing
Mark-Jan Nederhof, Giorgio Satta
Segregatory Coordination and Ellipsis in Text Generation
James Shaw