Reply to ``Comment on `Magnetic field effects on neutron diffraction in the antiferromagnetic phase of UPt3'''
Juana Moreno, J. A Sauls
Abstract
Fak, van Dijk and Wills (FDW) question our interpretation of elastic neutron-scattering experiments in the antiferromagnetic phase of UPt3. They state that our analysis is incorrect because we average over magnetic structures that are disallowed by symmetry. We disagree with FDW and reply to their criticism. FDW also point out that we have mistaken the magnetic field direction in the experiment reported by N. H. van Dijk et al. [Phys. Rev. B 58, 3186 (1998)]. We correct this error and note that our previous conclusion is also valid for the correct field orientation.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A new approach to the Kondo effect: sophomore's dream function and Lee-Yang zeros
V. Yu. Irkhin
Temperature evolution of spin dynamics in extended Kitaev models within an Abrikosov fermion theory beyond mean field
Daiki Sasamoto, Joji Nasu
Interplay of disorder and spin liquid physics in the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet YbZn2GaO5
Hafsa Zeroual, Shams Sohel Islam, Toni Shiroka et al.
X-ray absorption spectroscopic studies of oxygen-deficient double perovskite oxide NdBaCo2O5+δ (δ 0.65)
Himanshu Pant, S. Khalid, R. Bindu
Odd-Parity Crystalline Electric Field and Multipoles in Icosahedral Quasicrystal and Approximant: Magnetic Toroidal and Electric Dipoles in Ce-Based Systems
Shinji Watanabe, Syunta Furuya, Mitsuaki Kawamura
Real-Time Relaxation Dynamics of Dark Excitons in Mirror-Symmetric Monolayers
Rishabh Saraswat, Mantasha Ansari, Rekha Verma et al.