Comment on "Left-Handed Materials Do Not Make a Perfect Lens"
J. B. Pendry
Abstract
In a recent Physical Review Letter [1] Garcia and Nieto Vesperinas (GNV) dispute the claim of perfect lensing made in [2]. The thrust of the GVN paper is that the solutions proposed in [2] imply infinite energy density and are therefore inadmissible. They claim that finite absorption leads to catastrophic collapse of the amplifying solutions vital to focussing and that no useful effect can be achieved. In this Comment I show that, on the contrary, careful consideration of absorption results in solutions that are always well behaved and evolve smoothly and continuously to perfect resolution in the limiting case of zero absorption.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Knots in Condensed Matters
Y. M. Cho
Bouchaud's model exhibits two different aging regimes in dimension one
Gerard Ben Arous, Jiri Cerny
Periodic diffraction patterns for 1D quasicrystals
Pawel Buczek, Lorenzo Sadun, Janusz Wolny
Adiabatic association of ultracold molecules via magnetic field tunable interactions
Krzysztof Goral, Thorsten Koehler, Simon A. Gardiner et al.
High-Temperature Atomic Superfluidity in Lattice Boson-Fermion Mixtures
F. Illuminati, A. Albus
Constructive Methods of Invariant Manifolds for Kinetic Problems
A. N. Gorban, I. V. Karlin, A. Yu. Zinovyev