Comment on "First-Order Superconducting Phase Transition in CeCoIn5"
N. A. Fortune, H. A. Radovan, S. T. Hannahs, T. P. Murphy
Abstract
The Clogston estimate for the Pauli limit used in the original comment (and the paper to which it referred) neglects important effects that lead to a significant enhancement of the Pauli limit in CeCoIn5. The discussion in the original comment is therefore moot and the comment has been withdrawn.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Variational Monte Carlo Study of Superconductivity in a Correlated System with Broken Inversion Symmetry
Tsuyoshi Imazu, Katsunori Kubo
Predictions of superconducting properties from chemical bonding interactions
Francesco Belli, Trinidad Novoa, Ion Errea et al.
Exact Mirror-Parity Selection Rule for Electron-Phonon Coupling in Two-Dimensional Crystals
Nicolás F. Barrera, Javiera Cabezas-Escares, Francisco Munoz et al.
Ta-based S-I-S junctions for integrated superconducting electronics
Trent Borman, Cameron Bullock, Cole Chason et al.
Nonreciprocal charge transport in quantum materials: From superconductors to magnetic systems
Boning Yu, Yalei Huang, Alltrin Dhanarajagopal et al.
Intra-unit-cell Josephson scanning tunneling spectroscopy of the cuprate Bi1.2Pb0.8Sr2CaCu2O8+δ
Fengyu Yao, Jiong Mei, Wenjin Mao et al.