Reply to Comment on "Microscopic theory of network glasses"
Randall W. Hall, Peter G. Wolynes
Abstract
In a Comment (cond-mat/0310030) on our recent paper on network glasses (Phys. Rev. Lett., 2003, 90, 085505), Micoulaut and Boolchand (MB) compare our predictions on glass transitions in network systems for the ratios of the transition temperatures TA/TG and TK/TG with experimental data. They claim significant differences between experiment and theory are seen and claim the lack of agreement is due to flaws in our theory. Their comparison of TA/TG is incorrect as they do not measure the same quantity that our theory predicts. The TK/TG comparison shows remarkable agreement between theory and experiment.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A Gaussian process coarse-grained potential for Na-montmorillonite
Yalda Pedram, Yaoting Zhang, Laurent Brochard et al.
First-principles theory of phonon renormalization from nonlinear electron-phonon interactions
Florian Kluibenschedl, Matthew Houtput, Jacques Tempere et al.
Spin-Lattice Dynamics and Interactions in Magnonic Spinels
Hari Paudyal, Yuri Suzuki, Michael E. Flatté et al.
Magnon-Phonon Dynamics in Multidimensional Antiferromagnetic Oxides
Yogendra Limbu, Michael E. Flatté, Durga Paudyal
Strain-Induced Metal-to-Insulator Transition in Antiferromagnetic SrCrO3 Thin Films
S. Jöhr, A. Carta, J. Moreno et al.
Tuning the Coercive Field in Ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2-Al2O3 Heterostructures via Interfacial Charge Dynamics
Marshall B. Frye, Chanyoung Kim, Jeong-Woo Sun et al.