A Comparison of the Cc and R3c Space Groups for the Superlattice Phase of Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3
Ragini, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, Rajeev Ranjan, Dhananjai Pandey
Abstract
Recent controversy about the space group of the low temperature superlattice phase of Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 is settled. It is shown that the R3c space group for the superlattice phase cannot correctly account for the peak positions of the superlattice reflections present in the neutron diffraction patterns. The correct space group is reconfirmed to be Cc. A comparison of the atomic coordinates of Cc and Cm space groups is also presented to show that in the absence of superlattice reflections, as is the case with XRD data, one would land up in the Cm space group. This superlattice phase is found to coexist with another monoclinic phase of Cm space group.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Necessary conditions for benchmarking next-generation AI in materials discovery
Daniel E Widdowson, Tatiana V Kurlina, Olga D Anosova et al.
Doubly Metastable Synthesis for Accelerated Quantum Materials Discovery
Kyuho Lee, Berit H. Goodge, Soonhyun Kwon et al.
Phononic Frequency Combs in Twisted Bilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Heterostructures from First Principles
Naman Arora, Adarsh Ganesan
Improved screening of doped ZrO2 catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation from graph-based machine learning
Karsten Walz Jensen, Mie Andersen, Raffaele Cheula
Dislocation mediated twin boundary faceting in β-Sn
John Israel, Ian Chesser, Khanh Dang et al.
Ferroelectric Domain-Wall Motion, Stability, and Frequency Responses under Different Screening-Charge Conservation Laws
Sergei V. Kalinin