Fundamental inconsistencies of 'superstatistics'
B. H. Lavenda
Abstract
Fundamental inconsistencies of superstatistics are highlighted. There is no such thing as a superposition of Boltzmann factors; what is actually derived is a generating function and not a normalizable probability density. The beta density of the second kind for the energy is shown to be subordinated to a χ2-probability distribution, and this provides a power-tail distribution for lage values of the energy, comparable to a Pareto distribution. The authors' claim that the Laplace method will only work on the inverse Laplace transform in the opposite limit of small energies is shown to be incorrect. The exact expression is obtained by contour integration at a multipole located at the origin corresponding to the high temperature limit.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Robust Golden Ratio universality as a consequence of a circulant symmetry
Luka Paljk, Johannes Schmidt, Vladislav Popkov
Replica Transition at Measurement-Altered Ising Criticality
Kabir Khanna, Sara Murciano, Romain Vasseur
Scalene Yang-Baxter triples realize all nearest-neighbour Hamiltonians with global additive symmetries
Pramod Padmanabhan, Somnath Maity, Akash Sinha et al.
Graph-theoretic framework for semi-Markov networks: transient and stationary occupation probabilities, hitting times and weak ergodicity breaking
Julian Voits
Spectral optimization of spherical lattices and applications to classical and quantum interacting spin systems
Jonas Völler, Grigorios Makris, Fabian Hassler et al.
Entropic-ordered superfluid
Isabella Zane, Andrew Lucas