Analogy and Difference between Gelation and Percolation Process
Kazumi Suematsu
Abstract
It has been verified that the theory of gelation with cyclization effects is in good accord with experimental observations of gel points and gel fractions. Encouraged by this success we scrutinize the prediction limit of the theory through the rigor of the bond percolation theory. Significant disparity is found between the prediction of the gelation theory and that of the percolation theory. To find the reason of the disparity, we re-examine the distribution function of bond animals; the analysis showing that the percolation process differs from real gelations in two points: (i) whereas the real gelation obeys the principle of equireactivity of functional units, the percolation process does not; (ii) the substantial reduction of functionality occurs through the percolation process. These make the lattice model intrinsically different from real chemical processes. As a result, one can not make use of the percolation theory for the purpose of examining the validity of the gelation theory.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Multi-Fidelity Machine Learning for Predicting Startup Stress Growth and Strain Hardening in Wormlike Micellar Solutions
Saghar Zolfaghari, Nunzia Lauriello, Ilaria Cusano et al.
Non-equilibrium orientational dynamics of pinned topological defects in two-dimensional nematic liquid crystals
Petur Bryde, Jörn Dunkel
Thermodynamically consistent thixotropic viscoelastic modeling of human blood from a conformational free energy
Thomas Martinod, Andrés Córdoba, Jay D. Schieber
Effect of Small Particle Interactions on Assembly of Binary Colloidal Clusters
Dillip Kumar Mohapatra, Teun W. J. Verouden, Bos Everhardus Sprik et al.
Stationary distribution of active Brownian particles in a bounded domain
Alexandra Tzella, Daniel Loghin, David J. Needham et al.
Polarity-Programmed Topological Gating of Knotting in Spatially Patterned Active Polymers
Shiqi Zhou