Similarity and Dissimilarity between Influences of Anchoring Walls and of External Fields on Nematic and Smectic A Phases
M. Torikai, M. Yamashita
Abstract
The McMillan liquid crystalline models under the influence of homeotropic anchoring walls and of external fields are investigated. For thin systems, the existence of the critical thickness, below which the system does not undergo a discrete phase transition, is confirmed. Apparent differences between the influence of the anchoring walls and of external fields are elucidated by investigating the order parameters and a temperature vs external field phase diagram for the bulk systems.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Competing routes to spontaneous flow in confined active nematics
Rahil N. Valani, Vedad Dzanic, Sumesh P. Thampi et al.
Scaling and Condensation of Dry Active Matter Around Circular Obstacles
Felipe P. S. Júnior, F. Q. Potiguar, Jorge L. C. Domingos et al.
Active Hydrodynamics Couples Polymer Organization, Shape Fluctuations, and Motility in Deformable Droplets
Ritu Raj, P. B. Sunil Kumar
Inferring interactions between active particles using harmonic traps
Arnaud Compagnie, Joscha Mecke, Ivo Buttinoni et al.
Spontaneous filament formation and network self-assembly via active phase separation
Elena Lucas, Varun Venkatesh, Amin Doostmohammadi
Sensitivity of Nucleation Thermodynamics and Kinetics to the Treatment of Long-Range Interactions
Fernanda Sulantay Vargas, Kimia Sinaeian, Amir Haji-Akbari