Comment on "Nernst effect in poor conductors and in the cuprate superconductors"
Cigdem Capan, kamran Behnia
Abstract
In a recent letter, Alexandrov and Zavaritsky propose a model to explain the anomalous Nernst signal observed in the normal state of hole-doped cuprates. The aim of this comment is to recall that one of the main assumptions of the authors regarding the experimental data is false.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Metallogenic quantum criticality: Fermi surface nucleation at transitions between gapped phases
Zhengyan Darius Shi
Exact Stiffness and Dynamical Responses from Fock-Space Fragmentation
Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, Eslam Khalaf, Zhaoyu Han
A continuous confinement-deconfinement transition in a triangular quantum magnet
Suguru Hosoi, Sejun Park, Michihiro Hirata et al.
Multi-orbital physics in inverse Lieb lattice altermagnets
Mercè Roig, Jannik Gondolf, Andreas Kreisel et al.
3D- (H-theta-phi) magnetic phase diagram of antiferromagnetic metal GdB6 with electron and lattice instability
A. N. Azarevich, A. V. Bogach, T. F. Garipova et al.
Interlayer-engineering of Charge Order Wave Vector in Kagome Metals
Muntafa M. Mahi, Quazi D. M. Khosru, M. Zahid Hasan et al.