Comment on "Magnetic phase transition in Co/Cu/Ni/Cu(100) and Co/Fe/Ni/Cu(100)"
P. J. Jensen, C. Sorg, A. Scherz, M. Bernien, K. Baberschke, H. Wende
Abstract
In a recent Letter the phase diagram of Co/Cu/Ni/Cu(100) and Co/Fe/Ni/Cu(100) trilayers was determined experimentally as well as theoretically. Whereas we do not object the presented results, we remark that published work was not commented on. Especially, much more information can be extracted out of the measurements by a quantitative comparison with an appropriate model, allowing for a determination of important parameters such as exchange coupling constants.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A Gaussian process coarse-grained potential for Na-montmorillonite
Yalda Pedram, Yaoting Zhang, Laurent Brochard et al.
First-principles theory of phonon renormalization from nonlinear electron-phonon interactions
Florian Kluibenschedl, Matthew Houtput, Jacques Tempere et al.
Spin-Lattice Dynamics and Interactions in Magnonic Spinels
Hari Paudyal, Yuri Suzuki, Michael E. Flatté et al.
Magnon-Phonon Dynamics in Multidimensional Antiferromagnetic Oxides
Yogendra Limbu, Michael E. Flatté, Durga Paudyal
Strain-Induced Metal-to-Insulator Transition in Antiferromagnetic SrCrO3 Thin Films
S. Jöhr, A. Carta, J. Moreno et al.
Tuning the Coercive Field in Ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2-Al2O3 Heterostructures via Interfacial Charge Dynamics
Marshall B. Frye, Chanyoung Kim, Jeong-Woo Sun et al.