Comment on "Magnetic phase transition in Co/Cu/Ni/Cu(100) and Co/Fe/Ni/Cu(100)"
P. J. Jensen, C. Sorg, A. Scherz, M. Bernien, K. Baberschke, H. Wende
Abstract
In a recent Letter the phase diagram of Co/Cu/Ni/Cu(100) and Co/Fe/Ni/Cu(100) trilayers was determined experimentally as well as theoretically. Whereas we do not object the presented results, we remark that published work was not commented on. Especially, much more information can be extracted out of the measurements by a quantitative comparison with an appropriate model, allowing for a determination of important parameters such as exchange coupling constants.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Thermally enhanced magnon-phonon resonance in van der Waals antiferromagnet FePS3
Kai-Xuan Zhang, Beom Hyun Kim, Seungbok Lee et al.
Orbital Hall effect from the Wannier function approach
Tapesh Gautam, S. Satpathy
greenWTE: Frequency-domain solver for the phonon Wigner Transport Equation with arbitrary heating using Green's functions
Laurenz Kremeyer, Bradley J. Siwick, Samuel Huberman
Multiplicity of elastic wave propagation in random polycrystals
Ming Huang, Stanislav I. Rokhlin, Michael J. S. Lowe
Dynamical Phonon Anharmonicity Drives Charge-Density-Wave Softening and Electronic Quasiparticle Decoherence in Monolayer 1H-NbSe2
Yi Xia
Triboelectric nanogenerators across length scales: linking materials, multiscale modelling and applications
MD Tanzib Ehsan Sanglap, Ans Al Rashid, Abdullah Sayam et al.