Comment on "Domain Structure in a Superconducting Ferromagnet"
E. B. Sonin
Abstract
According to Faure and Buzdin [Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 187202 (2005)], in a superconducting ferromagnet a domain structure with a period small compared with the London penetration depth can arise. They claim that this contradicts to the conclusion of Sonin [Phys. Rev. B, 66, 100504 (2002)] that ferromagnetic domain structure in the Meissner state of a superconducting ferromagnet is absent in equilibrium. This contradiction is imaginary, based on misinterpretation of the results of these two papers.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Superconductivity in Pb2-xBixPd Single Crystals
S. Srivastava, R. P. Singh
Type-I superconductivity in a quasi-2D topologically nontrivial YbBi2
Karolina Górnicka, Sudip Malick, Joanna Bławat et al.
Generic thermodynamics of condensates with extremely small superfluid density ---Application to UTe2 and hidden second phase transition---
Kazushige Machida
Vortex-mediated spin current injection into two-dimensional superconductor NbSe2
Meng Yang, Xiaolong Yin, Jingjing Liu et al.
Superconductivity at the metal-insulator phase boundary in a bulk nickelate at ambient pressure
Hyo-Bin Ahn, Xinglong Chen, Hong Zheng et al.
Crystallographic imperfections and exotic superconductivity of UBe13
Andreas Leithe-Jasper, Markus König, Yusei Shimizu et al.