Reply to a Comment on ``Projective Quantum Monte Carlo Method for the Anderson Impurity Model and its Application to Dynamical Mean Field Theory''
M. Feldbacher, K. Held, F. F. Assaad
Abstract
In our reply, we show that the objections put forward in cond-mat/0508763 concerning our paper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 136405 (2004), are not valid: (i) There is no orthogonality catastrophe (OC) for our calculations, and it is also generally not ``unpractical'' to avoid it. (ii) The OC does not affect our results.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Metallogenic quantum criticality: Fermi surface nucleation at transitions between gapped phases
Zhengyan Darius Shi
Exact Stiffness and Dynamical Responses from Fock-Space Fragmentation
Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, Eslam Khalaf, Zhaoyu Han
A continuous confinement-deconfinement transition in a triangular quantum magnet
Suguru Hosoi, Sejun Park, Michihiro Hirata et al.
Multi-orbital physics in inverse Lieb lattice altermagnets
Mercè Roig, Jannik Gondolf, Andreas Kreisel et al.
3D- (H-theta-phi) magnetic phase diagram of antiferromagnetic metal GdB6 with electron and lattice instability
A. N. Azarevich, A. V. Bogach, T. F. Garipova et al.
Interlayer-engineering of Charge Order Wave Vector in Kagome Metals
Muntafa M. Mahi, Quazi D. M. Khosru, M. Zahid Hasan et al.