Reply to a Comment on ``Projective Quantum Monte Carlo Method for the Anderson Impurity Model and its Application to Dynamical Mean Field Theory''
M. Feldbacher, K. Held, F. F. Assaad
Abstract
In our reply, we show that the objections put forward in cond-mat/0508763 concerning our paper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 136405 (2004), are not valid: (i) There is no orthogonality catastrophe (OC) for our calculations, and it is also generally not ``unpractical'' to avoid it. (ii) The OC does not affect our results.
Create a lesson
Related papers
SrMn2Ge2: A metallic system with anomalous magnetotransport properties
A. van der Spuy, R. Warmbier, A. M. Strydom et al.
Hidden Triakontadipole Order in the Triangular-Lattice Magnet CeMgAl11O19
Yu-Bo Liu, Yuan Gao, Zhen Ma et al.
Closed- and open-system characterization of the Yukawa-SYK model in real time
Alex Windey, Christian H. Johansen, Philipp Hauke et al.
Small-data physics-informed ML model for magnetic exchange based on chemical composition and structure
Brice Kengni Zanguim, Thibaut Véry, Marie-Bernadette Lepetit
Thermodynamic Evidence for Multiple Field-Induced Phases in an Anisotropic Kagome Antiferromagnet
M. Schuchard, Q. Barthélemy, C. Marcenat et al.
Spin-orbit-locked symmetry and the stability of the triangular Dirac spin liquid in the ytterbium delafossites
Yasir Iqbal