Reply to comment by S.-K. Yip cond-mat/0611426
Ryan Barnett, Ari Turner, Eugene Demler
Abstract
We respond to S.-K. Yip's criticism of our work on the classification of spinor condensates. We explain why his criticism is unfounded, emphasizing that the phases he mentions have been addressed in our paper cond-mat/0611230. To provide a constructive aspect to this response, we use it as an opportunity to show how our classification scheme makes explicit not only spin rotations which leave spinor states invariant, but also the phase factors which need to accompany them.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Metallogenic quantum criticality: Fermi surface nucleation at transitions between gapped phases
Zhengyan Darius Shi
Exact Stiffness and Dynamical Responses from Fock-Space Fragmentation
Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, Eslam Khalaf, Zhaoyu Han
A continuous confinement-deconfinement transition in a triangular quantum magnet
Suguru Hosoi, Sejun Park, Michihiro Hirata et al.
Multi-orbital physics in inverse Lieb lattice altermagnets
Mercè Roig, Jannik Gondolf, Andreas Kreisel et al.
3D- (H-theta-phi) magnetic phase diagram of antiferromagnetic metal GdB6 with electron and lattice instability
A. N. Azarevich, A. V. Bogach, T. F. Garipova et al.
Interlayer-engineering of Charge Order Wave Vector in Kagome Metals
Muntafa M. Mahi, Quazi D. M. Khosru, M. Zahid Hasan et al.