Comment on ``Integrability and Coherence of Hopping between 1D Correlated Electron Systems''
David Clarke, Steven Strong
Abstract
We comment on recent numerical studies concerning coupled 1D electron liquids (F. Mila and D. Poilblanc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 287 (1996)). In particular, we point out that the importance of integrability observed in the results of these authors for the quantity P(t) is really an indication of the importance of integrability for questions of ergodicity, rather than questions of coherence. We discuss why this is so, and why the quantity < δN (t) > is a more appropriate function for determining whether or not interliquid hopping is coherent.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Metallogenic quantum criticality: Fermi surface nucleation at transitions between gapped phases
Zhengyan Darius Shi
Exact Stiffness and Dynamical Responses from Fock-Space Fragmentation
Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, Eslam Khalaf, Zhaoyu Han
A continuous confinement-deconfinement transition in a triangular quantum magnet
Suguru Hosoi, Sejun Park, Michihiro Hirata et al.
Multi-orbital physics in inverse Lieb lattice altermagnets
Mercè Roig, Jannik Gondolf, Andreas Kreisel et al.
3D- (H-theta-phi) magnetic phase diagram of antiferromagnetic metal GdB6 with electron and lattice instability
A. N. Azarevich, A. V. Bogach, T. F. Garipova et al.
Interlayer-engineering of Charge Order Wave Vector in Kagome Metals
Muntafa M. Mahi, Quazi D. M. Khosru, M. Zahid Hasan et al.