Comment on "Quantum Phase Slips and Transport in Ultrathin Superconducting Wires"
Ji-Min Duan
Abstract
In a recent Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1552 (1997) ), Zaikin, Golubev, van Otterlo, and Zimanyi criticized the phenomenological time-dependent Ginzburg-Laudau model which I used to study the quantum phase-slippage rate for superconducting wires. They claimed that they developed a "microscopic" model, made qualitative improvement on my overestimate of the tunnelling barrier due to electromagnetic field. In this comment, I want to point out that, i), ZGVZ's result on EM barrier is expected in my paper; ii), their work is also phenomenological; iii), their renormalization scheme is fundamentally flawed; iv), they underestimated the barrier for ultrathin wires; v), their comparison with experiments is incorrect.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Knots in Condensed Matters
Y. M. Cho
Bouchaud's model exhibits two different aging regimes in dimension one
Gerard Ben Arous, Jiri Cerny
Periodic diffraction patterns for 1D quasicrystals
Pawel Buczek, Lorenzo Sadun, Janusz Wolny
Adiabatic association of ultracold molecules via magnetic field tunable interactions
Krzysztof Goral, Thorsten Koehler, Simon A. Gardiner et al.
High-Temperature Atomic Superfluidity in Lattice Boson-Fermion Mixtures
F. Illuminati, A. Albus
Constructive Methods of Invariant Manifolds for Kinetic Problems
A. N. Gorban, I. V. Karlin, A. Yu. Zinovyev